Sectors
Use caseSecurity sector
Connect evidence custody, equipment accountability and incident reviews through RMZ workflows built around authorised access and traceable decisions.
Explore use cases ↗Who this is for
Security operations teams, facility protection departments, critical-infrastructure operators, evidence custodians and authorised auditors.
The operational challenge
Incident files, equipment handovers and access approvals are scattered across logs and inboxes. Missing context makes it difficult to establish who handled an item, which evidence was reviewed and when a decision changed.
Applications to evaluate
Evidence custody records with signed handovers, seals and exception history.
Equipment passports for issue, inspection, maintenance and return.
Time-bounded contractor credentials and reviewed access approvals.
Incident dossiers connecting source reports, authorised reviews and corrective actions.
Scoped audit exports and recovery records for controlled environments.
A proposed workflow
- Step 01
Classify the record and identify the authorised owner and permitted participants.
- Step 02
Capture source evidence in protected storage with integrity checks.
- Step 03
Approve each handover or access change and record exceptions.
- Step 04
Review the complete timeline, export permitted evidence and apply retention policy.
Custody from collection to review
Record the item identifier, collector, seal condition and each accepted handover. Preserve discrepancies and corrections so investigators can distinguish an original observation from a later review.
Equipment with an accountable history
Link devices, safety equipment and operational assets to issue receipts, inspection dates and maintenance evidence. Make overdue checks and unresolved handovers visible to the responsible team.
Access for a defined purpose
Design credentials around the facility, task and time window. Separate request, approval and audit roles; revoke access promptly and record emergency exceptions for later review.
Private by classification
Keep incident content, identities and sensitive locations off public ledgers. Define deployment isolation, key custody, logging, backup and recovery with the organisation’s authorised security team before connecting operational systems.
Continue the journey
FAQ
Questions, answered
Is sensitive evidence visible in the public explorer?
No. Public network activity and protected organisation records are separate. Sensitive files and access decisions belong in the authorised private environment.
Does this include public surveillance or automated enforcement?
The sector workflow focuses on evidence integrity, equipment records and accountable approvals. Surveillance, identity matching and enforcement are outside this workflow.
How are disputed handovers handled?
Keep the original event, record the disagreement and supporting evidence, and route it to an authorised reviewer. Corrections add a traceable event rather than silently replacing the history.
YOUR NEXT STEP
Build your next step
on trust.
Find the right starting point for your assets, records and business.
Find your use case