RMOZ / solutions
Move forward from what already works.
Start with one workflow. Keep your existing systems and add verifiable records where they solve a real business problem.
Migration roadmap
Six stages, each proven before the next.
- Stage 01
Assess existing systems
Map applications, data ownership, user journeys and dependencies, then establish a baseline for the coordination problem.
- Stage 02
Select the right records and workflows
Choose a focused scope where shared verification clearly improves an outcome compared with a conventional database.
- Stage 03
Integrate APIs and identity
Connect identities, permissions and event schemas to your existing systems, keeping sensitive evidence in the appropriate source systems.
- Stage 04
Configure registries and contracts
Define record states, issuer roles, approval rules and correction paths, with reviewed contract logic where it is needed.
- Stage 05
Prove the approach
Run a proof of concept that covers reconciliation, permissions, failures, recovery and user acceptance before onboarding live data.
- Stage 06
Govern deployment and operations
Go live after technical, legal and security approval, with clear release ownership, monitoring, incident response, tested backups and an exit plan.
Keep the business problem in view
Modernising an application does not require a wallet or a token. Start from a specific multi-party verification or reconciliation problem. If conventional authentication and a well-governed database solve it, that is the right answer.
Preserve the existing source of truth
Business rules and sensitive records stay in your established applications, while a focused proof or event interface is added alongside them. Each system’s ownership is defined, along with how disagreements are resolved, so you never run two competing sources of truth.
Introduce change in bounded stages
Map the current workflow, model the target process, prove failure handling and review results before expanding scope. Key custody, user support, recovery and fees are addressed explicitly from the start.
Require an exit as well as an entry
Success includes reversibility, data export and a business process that still makes sense if the ledger component is removed. We compare operating effort and user experience with your current approach before scaling.
FAQ
Questions, answered
Must users manage their own wallets?
Not necessarily; the answer depends on the problem, legal constraints and selected architecture. No wallet or key-management model is established here, and each option brings different recovery and custody risks.
Should all historical data move on-chain?
Usually that is not a justified starting assumption. Assess a minimal scope and retain personal or confidential records in systems with appropriate access, correction and deletion controls.
YOUR NEXT STEP
Build your next step
on trust.
Find the right starting point for your assets, records and business.
Find your use case